According to CCP 2.136, under what condition can peace officers avoid liability?

The provision in CCP 2.136 states that peace officers can avoid liability when they are acting in accordance with agency policy and law. This is fundamental because it establishes a legal framework that supports officers performing their duties within the guidelines set by their respective agencies and the law. When officers adhere to established policies and legal standards, it demonstrates that their actions are not arbitrary but are instead sanctioned and structured, which serves to protect them from liability in the event that an incident occurs.

This is crucial because adherence to agency policy often includes training protocols, established procedures for engagement, and ethical conduct expectations. In essence, if a peace officer acts according to these guidelines, they can show that they were fulfilling their responsibilities correctly, minimizing the risk of legal repercussions.

The other options, while they may imply beneficial practices, do not directly relate to the legal shield against liability provided in CCP 2.136. For instance, specific training or providing reports does not inherently guarantee that an officer's actions are compliant with the law or agency policies, which is what fundamentally matters in the context of avoiding liability. Similarly, informing a superior officer may be a good practice but does not itself provide the legal protection that is granted when actions align with established policies and laws.